
In a dramatic verdict shaking the land registration scene, the Kwale High Court today directed former Member of Parliament Omari Zonga to repay KSh 7,905,040 to a private company after being found liable in a contentious land dispute that also implicated ex-Governor Mike Sonko.
The ruling not only rejected the plaintiff’s attempt to revoke Sonko’s title deed but also unequivocally placed the financial burden and accountability squarely on Zonga’s shoulders.
Double Sale Uncovered, Evidence Unraveled
According to the court, Zonga had sold the same parcel of land twice — first to Mike Sonko in 2013, then again in April 2014 to the private company for KSh 7.75 million. The buyer claimed ignorance of the earlier transaction and sought cancellation of Sonko’s title, alleging fraud in the deed issuance.
Sonko defended his position, stating he lawfully purchased the land and was granted the title deed on March 26, 2013. The court found no credible evidence that his title was obtained through wrongdoing.
Facing weighty burdens of proof inherent in fraud cases, the plaintiff’s case against Sonko collapsed. As the court declared: it is Zonga — not Sonko — who bears the responsibility for inconsistent disclosures and the double transaction.
Judgment Breakdown: What Zonga Must Pay
Zonga was ordered to repay:
- KSh 7,750,000 — the purchase price he secured from the private company
- KSh 155,040 — stamp duty costs
Total: KSh 7,905,040
The court emphasized that Zonga’s own pleadings contradicted claims against Sonko, effectively exonerating the former governor from fault.
Legal and Political Ripples
- Vindication for Sonko
The ruling, while not fully clearing Sonko in all prior allegations, delivers a major legal reprieve—affirming his title’s validity in this case. - Precedent for Land Dispute Cases
The decision may influence how courts deal with double sales, title revocation suits, and conditions for fraud pleadings—raising the bar for plaintiffs who challenge registered titles. - Litigation Strategy in Graft Cases
For Sonko, battling state agencies and asset freezes, this verdict may energize his legal posture in other pending cases. - Pressure on Zonga and Associates
Zonga faces not only the financial burden but reputational damage. The judgment may trigger further scrutiny of his land transactions and public dealings.