Wamuzi News Ke
President William Ruto has defended his decision to hold Cabinet meetings outside the traditional State House boardrooms, insisting the move is intentional and aligned with his leadership approach.
His remarks follow growing criticism from political observers and former officials who argue the shift raises questions about governance practices and political motives.Ruto stated that relocating meetings from formal boardrooms to alternative venues is meant to promote openness and enhance direct engagement with communities.
According to the President, leadership must be accessible, and limiting Cabinet deliberations to the secluded spaces of State House undermines that principle.He said the government must remain connected to the public and avoid operating behind closed doors.
Ruto described the new approach as an effort to eliminate the perception of State House as an impenetrable institution reserved only for top officials.However, critics argue the strategy has more political than administrative value.
Some leaders view the move as a calculated effort to build political influence and mobilize support ahead of future elections. They claim that holding high-profile government meetings in public or symbolic locations gives the president an advantage in shaping political narratives while masking the activity as routine governance.
Former Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi added fuel to the debate by alleging that Cabinet meetings under Ruto operate under a climate of fear. Muturi claimed that dissenting views are discouraged, suggesting that body language and subtle signals from the President are enough to silence opposing opinions.
He described the environment as one where members feel compelled to agree rather than contribute freely.These allegations have sparked a wider national discussion on transparency, leadership style, and the proper use of State House facilities.
Analysts warn that while accessibility is important, consistent use of non-traditional venues may blur boundaries between official duties and political interests.The controversy continues to raise questions about how far the presidency should go in redefining traditional governance spaces.
For now, Ruto maintains that the change is intentional and necessary, but scrutiny over the practice is likely to persist as political tensions build ahead of future political seasons.
