A formal petition has been filed seeking parliamentary approval for the erection of a statue of former Prime Minister Raila Odinga at the grounds of the Kenya National Assembly, igniting a fierce discourse over legacy, symbolism and justice in Kenya’s political landscape.
The request, submitted by a Nairobi-based lawyer and backed by veteran political activists, appeals to the Nominated Members of Parliament and the parliamentary Heritage Committee to endorse “a permanent, honourific monument” of Odinga — hailed by supporters as the father of Kenya’s multi-party democracy. The petition coincides with the national mourning period following his death this month.
Why the petition matters now
Odinga’s passing at age 80 on October 15, 2025, has triggered nationwide reflection on his role in Kenya’s political evolution. He served as Prime Minister from 2008 to 2013, contested five presidential bids, and became a symbol of persistence and reform.
The call for a statue at Parliament — the epicentre of legislative power — signals a broader push to institutionalise his legacy and ensure his memory persists in public-space symbolism, not just political memory.
Reaction and implications
Supporters argue that the monument will recognise Odinga’s years of public service — including his role in pushing the 2010 Constitution and his long fight for electoral fairness. They say it will serve as inspiration for younger Kenyans and anchor him permanently in national history.
However, the proposal also carries significant risks and sparks debate:
- Political flashpoint: Placing a statue of a prominent opposition figure at Parliament may inflame partisan tensions and raise questions about which leaders are deemed “honourable” in public space.
- Financial and procedural scrutiny: The petition demands funding, design standards and site allocation — all of which fall under parliamentary oversight and may become contested.
- Legacy versus critique: While many admire Odinga, others remain critical of aspects of his political career. Embedding a monument raises questions about whether memorials can be selective in narrative.






