Wamuzi News Ke
Parliament is ablaze with controversy after the Senate introduced a landmark bill that would grant it sweeping powers to veto, reshape, and co-manage presidential appointments. If passed, the proposed Constitution of Kenya (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Senate Bill No. 13) could fundamentally alter the balance of power between the Executive and Legislature.
What the Proposal Changes — in Sharp Focus
The bill seeks to revise or reallocate powers in several key constitutional articles, effectively moving approval, vetting, and removal authority from the National Assembly to Parliament (both houses). Among the positions now targeted for Senate oversight are:
- The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP)
- Members of independent oversight bodies like the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA)
- The Controller of Budget
- The Auditor-General
- The composition and appointment powers of the Public Service Commission (PSC)
By supplanting certain references to the National Assembly with “Parliament,” the bill also ensures that removals or disciplinary petitions for commissioners and other constitutional office holders must now go through both Houses.
Another radical shift: the bill would allow legislation to originate from either the Senate or the National Assembly (except for revenue bills). Bills would only be forwarded to the President after passing both houses, rather than being initiated only in the Assembly.
Stakes, Risks & Political Flashpoints
Added scrutiny or gridlock?
Proponents argue the bill enhances oversight, democratizes checks and balances, and prevents unilateral dominance by the National Assembly over nominations. But critics warn it could entangle appointments in partisan politics, delay crucial public service roles, and create power deadlocks.
Vacancies could mount
If Senate vetting becomes a hurdle, critical institutions risk operating with leadership gaps. Delays in approving or removing officeholders might slow down operations in key sectors—justice, audits, public service, budgeting.
Politicization concerns
Senators with political agendas could block competent appointees for partisan gain. Instead of merit, appointments may become bargaining chips in parliamentary power plays.
Pushback from the Executive
President Ruto and his administration are likely to fiercely resist ceding control over key appointments—especially given their strategic importance in governance and oversight.
